Topic-icon Easley Prints

  • ScketreWhisp
  • ScketreWhisp's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Founder
  • Founder
More
2 years 6 days ago - 2 years 5 days ago #358 by ScketreWhisp
Easley Prints was created by ScketreWhisp
Ok

in 2014, Jeff Easley painted an oil of a skeleton with a sword during the Con.

This year at the Con, Jeff was selling those prints... supposedly signed, numbers and with a remarque.

I need to know who bought one please....

I need to know what number you have as well...

I need to know if you got one with a remarque on it
Last edit: 2 years 5 days ago by ScketreWhisp.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • ScketreWhisp
  • ScketreWhisp's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Founder
  • Founder
More
2 years 5 days ago #359 by ScketreWhisp
Replied by ScketreWhisp on topic Easley Prints
I also posted the Easley prints for sale at rpgmarketplace.com

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
2 years 5 days ago #361 by Badmike
Replied by Badmike on topic Easley Prints
I have print #6, signed and remarqued. The sig, #, and remarque are on on the print itself, not in the margins, so that might be why someone didn't know they had those, they are hard to see.

Also, talked to Zach Glazar, he has #16 (signed and remarqued)

Mike B.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • ScketreWhisp
  • ScketreWhisp's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Founder
  • Founder
More
2 years 2 days ago #368 by ScketreWhisp
Replied by ScketreWhisp on topic Easley Prints
Well, so far we know they are numbered incorrectly since there are 62 left over (we had 75 plus the Author's Proof) meaning 14 were sold.

In possession are 9 signed/numbered/remarqued (17-25), also 50 that are signed/numbered (26-75)

That's 59

Then we have a second #27, another with no number, no sig and no remarque, and we have the Author's Proof.

So Zach #16 isn't "real"... well, it's real, but you get my drift, it would have been the 14th print sold and thus numbered wrong. I will presume Mike's #6 was more like the 4th sold, but who knows. I'll have more info later as people reply

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
2 years 2 days ago - 2 years 2 days ago #372 by Badmike
Replied by Badmike on topic Easley Prints
I think the guy who said his wasn't signed finally looked at it closely and found it was signed, numbered and remarqued he just didnt notice it at first since it was on the print itself. Don't know if anyone else is claiming theirs was not signed/numbered/remarqued.

"Sorry I need to correct myself here... turns out mine is signed, was just signed in the dark part of the print and I didn't see it until I looked at an angle. But clearly there. So I can confirm #3 and #4 were signed, so at most only the first couple went unsigned, if any at all."

Mike B.
Last edit: 2 years 2 days ago by Badmike.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
2 years 2 days ago #375 by stahlnee
Replied by stahlnee on topic Easley Prints
I prefer to think of it as inconsistently and not necessarily sequential.

All items numbered, signed, remarqued are good.

Just some duplication in numbering and skipped numbering may exist.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.135 seconds